Home | Library | Forum | Digs | Travel/Study | Store | Subscribe
In me is fuliflled the fact that Elijah does not go to heaven. Elijah wrote a letter to the king after the funnel-cloud picked him up, and what is called chariots of fire did not pick him up but merely separated Elijah from Elisha. Elijah was then set down elsewhere, where he wrote his letter to the king later. So too Russell and Rutherford are in heaven with the calling. Thus God cannot allow Elijah to stay fulfilled as them because Elijah must be less than the bride, not part of it. But one of the things that seem most fated is that Russell was killed on Halloween (All Saints Eve) in 1916 AD after exactly 40 years of preaching from 1876-1916 AD when Barbour in 1876 printed 26-year old Russell's paper on 7 times (its last 40 years claimed as 1874-1914 AD). I too was 26 at my calling in 1983. Haha I just turned 53 so I guess I am not the 52-year sacrifice of the Maya.But it would now seem that New Kingdom calculating Joseph's 1738 BC Thoth 1 November 1 back to NK.Payni 23 not only allows them to mistakenly presume the first Halloween was 2030 BC Nov 1/2 on Payni 23/24, but to see it as the Christmas suicide (10th month 24 th day) correctly being the calendar's first Koyak 24 on May 5 in 2029 BC. We know suicide is Koyak 24 not Payni 24 because Payni gets shifted and is really Payni 19. We also know the suicide is marked by the 3-day moon of the reborn Osiris becoming Horus the new born exalted in the west over mother Venus Ishtar Isis. This is May 5 not Nov 1.
1) mistakes in the Bible (not actual chariots, just a tornado,2) and you're an Elijah not prophesied in the Bible, etc.) 3) It would have been nice if the Apostles had told us...4) And not one of Them bothered with any exhortations to study the stars and their dates, since they are so necessary to the vital prediction of the end times to the day and the hour. ... 5) I think it wise that we shelve our Bibles, ...6) nothing of what you are saying is mentioned anywhere therein, much less hinted at (e.g. bride sacrifices).
Should we ditch church and just study your bulletins?
Quote from: notalent on Oct 12, 2009, 11:08 PM1) mistakes in the Bible (not actual chariots, just a tornado,2) and you're an Elijah not prophesied in the Bible, etc.) 3) It would have been nice if the Apostles had told us...4) And not one of Them bothered with any exhortations to study the stars and their dates, since they are so necessary to the vital prediction of the end times to the day and the hour. ... 5) I think it wise that we shelve our Bibles, ...6) nothing of what you are saying is mentioned anywhere therein, much less hinted at (e.g. bride sacrifices). 1) quoting at 2 Kings 2:11As they were walking along and talking together, suddenly a chariot of fire and horses of fire appeared and separated the two of them, and Elijah went up to heaven in a whirlwind. - it does not say the chariots took him, it says the whirlwind did. The fire was of two chariots separating him.
Now which chariot would YOU throw out, or do you have the freedom to draw a picture of itty bitty chariots so he can have a foot on each one.2) at Malchi 4:5 everyone knows Elijah must return, to end the world.
The 2000 years from John The Baptizer to now is not sufficient to be total fulfillment. This is also why Jesus is not sufficient as a one-time Christ he declares he will return the exact same way, descend again and rise again. He descends as the birth of the church, he gathers it on earth in flesh, and takes it to heaven the same way he got there, the last ones sacrificed as he was.
This is the only way that all can see it, and yet not see it because they deny it was Christ.3) why do you say the apostles? Moses told us, so by their quoting Moses in some words, they in essence understood ALL of Moses who wrote....
4) at Genesis 1:14 And God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark seasons and days and years, - so here Moses claims God himself declared the stars must be used to mark the day and hour.
5) Satan said it be wise Eve eat the fruit, and you say it be wise we shelve our Bibles. So the intent of yours is bad in either direction; you either mean it and say shelf the Bibles, or you mock claiming that I am saying we should shelf them, and I said this not. You said it, not I. No it is not true; and we must definately do eat of every scripture; but it is also true because every utterance of God is in things around us speaking out to us beyond that written Bible. God's word is written in the flowers, it is written in the trees, it is written in stone, and in water, and in all things, they speak out to us saying far much more than look what a great God I am, or look how wise I am. All things he created are tangible like us so that we may see that what happens to these things are physical laws that also happens to us. That makes them spiritual words that warn us so that we can live in the flesh not die because we are flesh.
6) Nahor's death is covered over (evidence of suicide sacrifice)
, he lived 148 and his son lived 205; yet his son is reduced from 205 to 145 to look as if Nahor is natural aging. [2177-2029 BC and 2148-1943 BC.] It doesnt make Terah look as if in natural descent of longevity; it covers over the question of why did Nahor die 60 years before he ought to have. Yet it is the CALENDAR (Sothic exodus) as 137+720 that proves 857 years so that Terah was 205 +430 to exodus (not 400 as affliction, not 615 in Egypt, not 79 for Nahor. Acts 13:20 is a court case where in court he goes thru time and calendar by years because contrary to what you say, it DOES matter. I read and hear of no man at that court ridiculing him saying what does it matter 450 years to judges and 350 years of judges.
Haran too returned to Ur to die; [2078-2029 BC at 49] yet to RETURN to die in his birth city means he had LEFT it (and built his own city Harran in 2048 BC at 30; his journey so far north was easily drafted at 18 to build Nineveh in 2060 BC]. So why did he come back home to die in Ur, so that Abram had to go up to Harran to watch over Lot. [1991 BC at 27 to be bi-residential 48 years] And why was Lot not brought to Ur (it is because Lot was 11 years older). Haran did not know his wife was pregnant when he returned to Ur in 2029 BC to die in mass suicide sacrifice. What is your reason for Isaac's sacrifice at age 25 in 1893 BC? Jewish tradition says he was 25. Babylon declared itself the resurrection of society on Nov 2 of 1894 BC, the 360-day new year, 1-01-1083. [1894 BC Nov 1= MK Epipi 22 =NK Epipi 27; note this is new kingdom 11-27 easily confused with Noahs 360-day 11-27 being Chinese Feb 2 in 1437 BC which claims their calendar was 1200 years earlier in 2637 BC. All this is their attempt to declare a Venus of 3-27 returned as it was in the Flood]==The whole educational world and its schools are about mockery ==Schools are temples to collect money in the claim that its teacher priests are educating us. All business, and churches, and schools, and webpages either volunteer what they feel they know, or they strive to fund raise. IT is about money. So slam others as liars to be on top, or do it with zeal for the mere reason you see yours is the truth. But do you kill to do it!Isaac was offered up because Abram was mocked that the whole world could be saved by his own awesome knowledge of truth rather than thru a cooperative city like Babylon and its schools. But when told how will he help anyone if and when he dies, he has no son he said to carry on these truths; then he put faith in someone else who said clean yourself by cutting you dirty skin off as the cure. And so he obtained his son whose mother was not like Hagar teaching Egyptian concepts of God. But then the same applied to Isaac that applied to Abram. Look your son is single and childless (like Jesus). How will you save the world if your son dies. Sacrifice your son and then see if the world can be saved. At least the Marduk of Babylon is just an idol to keep track of Mars as a calendar to year 6000 by having a good fun party on those days. Abram sacrificed his son to excuse THEIR ERROR. And he put faith that a different alternative would occur if there was a God. So someone showed up as a messenger and they had shoved a sheep in the bush for Abram. He need not be told whether he is an angel from heaven, nor need he be told how the sheep got there. It is Satan who lies by teaching that honesty means expose all things and do it clearly without parable or you are the liar and devil. Satan teaches this because Jesus did not teach this, Jesus did not do this. Jesus spoke in metaphor without sinning by it. Metaphor is not sin. Rebecca did not sin by doing what her eyes saw, prove that Jehovah or proper results always occurred with Jacob not Esau. Adam blamed Eve, but Isaac said this must be of Jehovah, so I cannot give the blessing to Esau that I gave Jacob. He accepted Jehovah the alternative method.I am flattered you think me an example. I am not the Christ-bride example. I sin greatly. Thank you for honoring me with what is hers, but I cannot accept it. I am just flattered that you think me worthy of what will happen to her, and what happened to Jesus. Sad that you are the one who would do this though. Go do what you seek to do; here I hand you the bread and then also the wine for dipping. You feel I am self appointed as YOUR keeper. So who appointed YOU as my keeper. When does my blood lay spilt on the ground crying out in the eyes of the world watching.The last Elijah foretold(thelastelijah@aol.com)and yet behold there will be Elijah in 1000 years(and though Elijah be there awake, and John the Baptizer be there, and I be there, he will be yet another Elijah)
The part about them being sacrificed isn't mentioned anywhere. So again, the Bible is defective. You are now the oracle people should heed. You're the 13th apostle. That's a nice Biblical number.
They didn't bother mentioning these things in the letters to the churches or the general epistles.
But the Bible says that it alone is sufficient to furnish man to every good work. Clearly this isn't so, because if we just stick to it, we would ignore your words which are all the stuff not covered in the Bible, like the day and hour of the end and that a worldwide flood is coming again because the rainbow covenant is a scam and we need to flee to mountains 6000 feet above sea level and the Bride must be killed and stuff like that.
Only time spans are mentioned, not specific dates like you. Don't try to defend the Bible by equating what it is saying with vague approximations with your specific Julian dates. Give yourself some credit.
See, another prophesy. I think Revelation 22:18 was an ill-advised entry, for see how many things may be added that were missing. But again, they got so many things wrong anyway...
Any man who says these words you say, echo as the same words said by those standing around Jesus, saying what you say to me, saying these words to Jesus. I do agree that such words are also said to those who are truly wrong. But then you do not learn what Jesus said. He was saying be careful or you might kill those who are saints. And then he proved you would kill him.
Try an issue of the world’s leading publication of Biblical archaeology at no obligation.Try us now!
Get Bible and archaeology news, behind the scenes stories, special offers and more.
Offer valid in U.S. only. Canadian & International Subscriptions
Template Design By Nuno Guerra