New date 1458 BC and 1242 BC for Mayan origin from Noah

[Elijah]

Previously I posted how the rise of Sothis on July 17 at Memphis Egypt (30 degrees) in 1314 BC rises 16 days earlier on July 1 at Copan (at 14 degrees) and June 30 at Volcano Cosguina (13 degrees).

http://forum.bib-arch.org/ancient-people(s)/migration-frpm-china-to-copan-770-bc/?wap2

Understand that during 4 years, the shift of our placing of leap day and the shift of Sothis is not the same year/s. As our exact hour of seasons will shift around on 24 hours overlapping two dates, so does the Sothic event. So although 2030 BC Memphis averages July 17 it is moving into July 18 (perhaps one year of 4). So in 1314 BC the average is now July 18 but still occurs in July 17 (perhaps one year of 4). Thus all I can do in my lack of astral knowledge (far better & deeper than the average Wikipedia poster on this topic), is to say that the 16 degrees between 30 degree Memphis Egypt and 14 degree Mayan Copan is a 16 day difference in Sothis be it July 1-17 or July 2-18. Aligning the Mayan calendar (whose debate was Gregorian Aug 10 or 11 or 12 or 13; and whose favored G.Aug 11 as day Ahau is ONLY because they love the fact it places Ahau on our G.Dec 21 in 2012 instead of Dec 20 or 22 or 23). Using the correlation that agrees with Noah's calendar

(10-01-600 being July 8 in 2369 BC/Armenian;
7-01-601 being Apr 4 in 2368 BC/ astral Venus Mars;
1-01-966 being July 8 in 2009 BC /astral Mars;
1-01-944 being Nov 1 in 2031 BC/Halloween;
1-01-1083 being Nov 2 in 1894 BC/ ALL SOULS
and a dozen to 100 more dates confirmed all interlocking)
the Mayan calendar therefore proves that its Mayan day 1 (imix) is Noah's 1-21 after Mayan day zero (ahau).

My heart could easily defy all this alignment with this Noahs calendar that you may say only I created in my imagination. But the combined evidence for every date could easily seduce me seeking public approval by the simple fact that the accepted G.Aug 11 date will place day 1 of tun 1 on Sep 1 of 3113 BC (a nice connection to Greek Flood 2958 BC where Greek Sep 1 is Thoth 1 in 2957 BC). However, this day 1 (imix) on Sep 1 does have day zero (Ahau) before it on Aug 31, the G.Aug 12 epoch merely says it is day 0 (Ahau) that is Sep 1 in 3113 BC placing day 1 (imix) of 1 tun on Sep 2. The world's preference however seems to be far out weighed by the number of dates aligned for Noah's calendar thruout Genesis from Flood 2370 BC to Exodus 1513 BC.

=== new date 1243 BC May 27 ===
As of 2009 AD Oct 7, I confirmed correlation between Mayan 360-day and Epipi 27 significance to the Noah's date:

1244 BC May 27 = day  8  Ahau = tun 1897; Kumku 13 =MK.Mesor 2 =NK.Mesor 7
1243 BC May 22 = day  4  Ahau = tun 1898; Kumku  8 =MK.Epipi 27 =NK.Mesor 2
1242 BC May 16 = day 13 Ahau = tun 1899; Kumku  3 =MK.Epipi 22 =NK.Epipi 27
1241 BC May 10 = day   9 Ahau = tun 1900; Kayab 18 =MK.Epipi 17 =NK.Epipi 22

MK =Middle Kingdom = Persian 365-day =Zoroaster Aban 27
13 Ahau is 1242 BC on May 22 aligning to 13 Ahau 3113 BC Sep 1 as 1898 tun from tun 1 to tun 1899. As such 1898 tun are 26x 73 tun equal to 26x 72 haab of which this date is Kumku 3 (360 days after epoch date Kumku 8, as is 13 Ahau is 360 days after epoch day 4 Ahau) and is very important to Genesis theology because it is New Kingdom date Epipi 27 (11th month 27th day, preExodus 5th month 27th day) with the name Epipi as symbol of the epiphany. The original epiphany of VENUS the morningstar is Noahs 40th day 3-27-600 on Jan 6 in 2369 BC of the actual Flood. But his death in 2021 BC shifted the 40th day as a resurrection to heaven on 5-27 (Feb 2). This is honored by Venus in 1437 BC on Feb 2 which is 11-17, all in 360-day calendar. But Epipi 27 is the date 11-27 in 365-day calendar. So for the Maya to have their Kumku 3 on Epipi 27 shows that they felt the Flood year of 360 days ended with the date Epipi 27 as the rise of Venus ending the Flood. But this is a corruption from 3-27 being Jan 6 of only 40 days of the Flood not the whole 360 days.

Further, this date Epipi 27 (Kumku 3) and its 72-year cycle of 73-tun go back twice (144 years) to 1458 BC to the date July 20 which is Sothic for 33-32 degrees latitude between Babel and Ur (including Jerusalem). And being 144 years also explains how the VENUS of the true 2256 AM in 1770 BC as Noahs year 1200 is used by these Maya in 1242 BC for the Venus tablets of 1626 BC (144 years later). [1626 BC is Adams year 2400 and Noahs 1344 from birth; but Maya use 1770 BC as Adams 3600 and Noahs 1344 from Flood 3114 BC... which 744 years is 180 solar seasonal leap days, 1488 years as 360 solar seasonal leap days).

Thus the two dates confirmed by the end of the 360-day false Flood 3114 BC (G.Aug 12) to 3113 BC Julian Sep 1 are:
1458 BC July 20
1242 BC May 27
both dates being Epipi 27 and Kumku 3
believing the epoch to be 360 days earlier on Kumku 8.
The date Kumku 8 falls on Persian Epipi 27 of Egyptian Middle Kingdom dates before 1513 BC exodus and is why in 388 BC it became Zoroastrian Aban 27.
This is why others have published old 1940-1960s books on how all these calendars do have merge points all over in many crosspoints of cycles. To research these cycles and ignore Genesis is a deliberate shunning the Bible as being of God Jehovah. It is  like Eve beleiving she will find God Jehovah without the assessment of the fruit that Adam had determined was God Jehovah. It is the rebellion against truth, rejecting truth already learned by people before us, and from people before us. This is what kills 6 billion instead of 1 billion or 1 million.
All that I post is still really for the purpose of promoting life and survival, though I am the one foretold to be crying repent you sinners, change or die, for the bride has arrived and I am awakening her for her wedding.

ELIJAH
shakey faith but still hanging in there.

PS. The dates 1242 BC and 1458 BC were inevitable since 1986 AD because I have known 1242 BC to be the Mayan 312-year cycle (12x 312) which was really started by Hamurabi in 1770 BC and known to Seleucus (312 BC) and Magi (AD) and Constantine 312 AD. But Maya switched it before those men did, doing so in 1242 BC as 6x 312 from their FLOOD. The dates had to be correlated then somewhere between exodus 1513-1242 BC, and that meant a comparison of 52-year calendar and 72-year calendar which brings in 1458 BC as 144 years before 1242 BC. Unless I have discovered this Epipi 27 before and have alzeimers or a brain fart, it has now been 23 years for me to find that date, just as i also knew 1314 BC revealed Mayan foundation city but didnt know where to start for 23 years now. The move of the five epagum days in 1513 BC will shift formulas by 20 years for the 5 leap days; shifting one way as 20 years (52-72) or the other way making a 40-year difference as in Sinai wilderness. The answer is this date Epipi 27.
 And the fact that it is 11th month verifies its confusion with Chinese date 11-27 oon Feb 2 in 1437 BC and thus mass Chinese migration to America across the Pacific merged with Egyptian knowledge which still could have seeped in from smaller families merging from the Atlantic.

[Elijah]

 (my apology for posting before refining, but it's better you see that discovery is a work in progress; some call it obsession)

I caught a 5-day ERROR. This article previously said 1242 BC was May 27. It is May 22, and 1243 BC is May 27. However, day 13 Ahau remains in 1242 BC so that it does not sweetly fall on a May 27. Very sweet before, when the error equated May 27 and Epipi 27, but as you can see it doesnt equate. But still the main discovery that date 13 Ahau remains on Epipi 27 where it does matter since this is an equation between Maya and Egypt and Noah.

Julian equvalency is not as easy to trace due to months with 31 days. i.e. 2958 BC Thoth 1 = Sep 2 not Sep 1 yet Dec 25 = Koyak 25, the next year Thoth 1 = Sep 1 and now Dec 24 = Koyak 25. So matching Julian to the former 365-day calendar is not an easy task, it is actually easier to match the ancient foreign calendars which have 30-day months. A leap day amonst the extra 5 epagum days is also easier, since the months remain 30 days.

[Elijah]

The correlation of Mayan to their Flood 3114 BC is such that they founded Copan in 1314 BC in what they regarded as Noah's year 1800 (haab /365-day) from 3114 BC.

Where does this come from in Genesis? It comes from the death of Nimrod at 500 occurring the year Judah was born in Adams year 2256. This number 2256 is later mistaken as the Flood year because it marks 600 years of Venus. So Flood 1656 +600 = 2256 but is later insisted as being Noah's birth 1656 +600 = 2256 Flood. (Reduced to 2242, and expanded to 2262. The reason? Year 3192 =2256+936 then debated 2242+950, then argued 2262+930 all based on the name Mene /Manu argued as Nimrod or Noah or Adam.)

So how does the Maya get 1800. It is the discovery of watching Venus for 600 years as a pentacle that rotates half-way and thus assuming it will be full circle in 1200 years. This discovery 600 years after Flood is Noahs year 1200, and so causes debated confusions in the future. But to count Venus as 1200 from this 600 produces a return in year 1800 after Flood. Destroy a world with an asteroid by changing axis and orbit and spin and you force a new calendar. New world = new calendar. But others reverse this and say a new calendar year, or new calendar cycle, starts a new world that we should change; and so someone takes over and rules. This is how I predicted Saddam's TV announcement with the triad of 1991 Jun 18. I had been currently studying the 3744 years of Maya (4x936 years, 12x 312 years, 312 BC / 312 AD in relation to the three Magi; 780-day Mars, 584-day Venus, and the fact that 1770 BC Venus triads with Mars and Jupiter passing the sun). Kaboom, a triad appears in 1991 that I can predict.

So then there is another relationship that exists where 72x 365 days = 73x 360 days. This 72 years is not just doubled to be 144 from Hamurabi's 1770 BC (2256 AM) to Amizaduga's 1626 BC (2400 AM), but also to 1554 BC which is Moses 40 years old, 40 years after Babylon falls, and the published most accurate date for Stonehenge (Jan 4) in Adams year 2472 (the 2400 +72). This Stonehenge has 56 aubrey holes said to mark 56 years (from 2472 AM the remaining 3528 years to 6000 are 63x 56 years).

How does this relate to Maya? Well the 2400 to 2472 years of Amizaduga's death (1626 BC) to Moses disputing with Jannes at 40 while Hitites have gone to Britain and built Stonehenge fit the year 1242 BC in Copan. The Maya regard 1770 BC as Noahs 1344 from Flood 3114 BC; but this is correctly 1344 from Noah's birth 2970 BC to Amizaduga 1626 BC. They also regard 1770 BC as Adam's year 3600 (2256+1344) when Amizaduga not Hamurabi is year 2400 (2256+144 or 1656+744 or 1056+1344) and the 3600 is expected to year 6000. This also then means they think 1626 BC is year 3744 as recognition that 3744+2256 = the 2256+3744. But reversing math as a check only confirms your math, not the year you picked for it.

So finally in conclusion, if they take year 2400 and 2472 and they regard 600 years of it as Noah before the Flood, then they will assume prophecy is awaiting 1800 and 1872 years after the Flood. Their calculation was 1314 BC and 1242 BC. The first 72 years of Copan settled by the Maya.