The signature 'archeology' wrote: "the same with this ossuary, there is NO evidence connecting it or the bones with the Jesus of Nazereth, the Christ. NOTHING but a name on a box and this leap to a conclusion is just a giant leap to an assumption which belongs to those people, like jacobovici, cameron and tabor, who have nothing better to do than cause trouble."
I will reply to the above paragraph.
Le-havdil (to differentiate),
The person who wants to research about a first century Jew must research first century sources, like the Dead Sea Scrolls 4Q MMT. There was a first century Jew named Ribi Yehoshua, from Natzrat (hellenized to Nazareth). To find information about the historical Ribi Yehoshua (the Messiah) who lived in Natzrat, we must study first century Jewish documents (for example Dead Sea Scroll 4Q MMT) and apply formal logic.
So let’s use the scientifically and logical method to demonstrate who the first century Jew Ribi Yehoshua was. It is not an assumption that Ribi Yehoshua from Natzrat was a Ribi (Not the same as “Rabbi”; see definition in our glossaries in the below website). He is called ‘Ribi Yeshua’ on the Talpiot Tomb to name one thing.
See
www.netzarim.co.il ; “History Museum” (left menu); “Mashiakh”-section (top menu); Tapliot Tomb-section
Prof. of Statistics Andrey Feuerverger has demonstrated that, contrary to the mathematically-challenged critics of the Yaaqov ossuary, the chances that the ossuaries in the Talpiot Tomb aren't those of the family of the 1st-century Pharisee Ribi Yehoshua are 1:1600 (Feuerverger, Prof. Andrey – The Final Word,
http://projecteuclid.org/aoas).
The assumptions he based his statistical analys on is correct. See our above website where we proof that his assumptions is correct.
Le-havdil (to differentiate), On the other hand we know that the Christian Jesus said things that contradict against Torah (for example Matt 28:19-20; Joh 3:16, et al.)
Logic dictates that we differentiate from two diametrically different concepts. That is: They are not the same person. The person stating they are the same has the burden of proof.
In the same way we know from documents as Dead Sea Scrolls 4Q MMT, that a first century Ribi (I proved above that Ribi Yehoshua died as a Ribi) can never had said some of the words in the Christian gospel Matthew.
That is one reason to that a reconstruction is needed. “The Netzarim Reconstruction of Hebrew Matityahu (NHM)” (see the Israel Mall in the left menu at our website).
The author of the post I answered wrote this: "you are goingtohave to come up with some very, very credible evidence to say that those bones belong to Jesus Christ.""
This post clearly shows that there is no historical person "Jesus Christ". Dead Sea Scrolls 4Q MMT clearly shows us that no first century person would have hade the permission to teach in the "synagouges" of the first century history that said things like those in Joh 3:16.
le-havdil, The research published in this post clearly shows that the tomb belongs to the historical Pharisee Ribi Yehoshua. The one who states otherwise has the burden of proofs on him/her.
You'll find significant documented historical information not published in the Christian world at
www.netzarim.co.ilFinding the historical Jew, who was a Pharisee Ribi and following him brings you into Torah, which gives you a rich and meaningful life here on earth and great rewards in life after death (“heaven”)!
[Some quotes in this post: Paqid Yirmeyahu ha-Tzadiq]
Anders Branderud
Geir Toshav, Netzarim in Ra’anana
Poll
Author
