Biblical Archaeology ReviewHomeSubscribe
+  The Biblical Archaeology Society Forum
|-+ 
BAS Info and Help

| |-+  Feedback
| | |-+  Administrative Request to create New Link Topic THE FLOOD
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Administrative Request to create New Link Topic THE FLOOD  (Read 620 times)
Elijah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 842



View Profile Email
« on: Apr 12, 2009, 11:18 AM »

I would like to enter my vote in for a topic link strictly for Biblical Flood (Noah, ark, physics of, preFlood world, Ararat, expeditions) to cover the hudnreds of more aspects than Exodus or Jerusalem Temple.

I feel that this topic is of equal value. The city and temple are real to archeologists. The Exodus debated. But the Flood is as equal as the Exodus of whether being real or not and what manner. It is a topic of its own that holds much and I realize that if it existed then preceding Israel in time I then wonder how it is my option is to list it as ISRAEL in topic as if one of Jewish myths. I rather see it have its own link as Exodus has. In this way Hitite and Ararat and Turkey and Armenia become just as important as Egypt with its pyramids which cannot compare to mount ararat and its Pharaohs which cannot compare to the concept of a rulership that descended Ararat.

Interesting is if you look up Hitite, though scholar atheists wish to belief it as different than those who were of Bible Ararat or the Hitites that destroyed Ur (king IbbiSin) in 1900 BC (mistaken for 1st dynasty Ur falling in 2029 BC because IbbiSin revived the 2nd dynasty by putting his servant on an Isan throne in 2017 BC at Abram's birth). But look up the city of Hattusa /Hattusha and you will see the library was deciphered by realizing a single sentence was Latin English not Semetic nor Sumerian. In it the words agua watar means to drink water. Agua or aqua meaning to drink or a drink and water being the substance. And that then deciphered the whole library.
These are things should we place in Other Peoples as Hitites or should they not be in Ararat and Flood with ark and Noah. So I move for a vote to create a Flood Land and its People. Even the Bible says they moved from the mountain to the fertile valley to build the cities like Babel.
But they had to get over the fear that rain which did not exist before the Flood was not going to Flood the whole valley again.... (its not the rain that did it, and the rainbow proves that rain of 40 days at 12 inches per day or half inch per hour will not occur again under an indefinate unknown millenia of time that the water canopy no longer exists).

Logged

ELIJAH
of 1996 back now in 2008
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  
Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
 
Subscribe to BAR


FREE ISSUE!

Try an issue of the world’s leading publication of Biblical archaeology at no obligation.
Try us now!








Get Bible and archaeology news, behind the scenes stories, special offers and more.



Subscribe now and receive either a free gift or a free issue
Powered by SMF 2.0 RC1 | SMF © 2006–2009, Simple Machines LLC

Template Design By Nuno Guerra