Biblical Archaeology ReviewHomeSubscribe
+  The Biblical Archaeology Society Forum
|-+ 
General Biblical Archaeology Discussion Topics

| |-+  Digs/Sites
| | |-+  Blogging from Megiddo
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Blogging from Megiddo  (Read 1547 times)
ehcline
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile Email
« on: Jun 20, 2008, 09:47 PM »

If anyone is interested, we have set up a blog for the Megiddo excavations, with about 10 bloggers posting, two per day.  We began digging on June 15 and will be going until July 31.  The website is: digmegiddo.wordpress.com

Cheers,  EHC
Logged
Admin1
Administrator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 357


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: Jun 21, 2008, 04:44 AM »

Thanks for filling us in :)

Please update here on occasion ;)
Logged
archaeologist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 594


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: Jun 21, 2008, 02:57 PM »

here is the link:

http://digmegiddo.wordpress.com/

Quote
It will be run by George Washington University students under the direction of Eric Cline

plus here is another link:

Quote
It joins the existing blog by Aren Maier at Tel es-Safi (Gath,)


http://gath.wordpress.com/
Logged

wigwam
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: Jul 11, 2008, 09:13 AM »

if prof. cline does return to this thread for a visit, it would be interesting to hear his comments regarding the site identification of megiddo. in the tall el-hammam thread prof collins has stated that there exists no in-situ inscriptional evidence on site at megiddo to identify that site as the biblical city (typical of most all "biblical" sites), and that it is identified solely by extra-site geographical evidence from a handful of written sources. this is true so far as i can tell. of course, the bible does mention it, as do some egyptian writings, particularly those of thutmosis iii. collins says that the number of geographical criteria for Sodom from the biblical text are at least triple the number for megiddo. regardless, it would be interesting to see how the geographical arguments from extant texts are applied in the case of identifying the site of megiddo. such a geographical exercise for megiddo could be compared with that for Sodom to test the scientific viability of the geographical approach to each. just a thought.

ww
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  
Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
 
Subscribe to BAR


FREE ISSUE!

Try an issue of the world’s leading publication of Biblical archaeology at no obligation.
Try us now!








Get Bible and archaeology news, behind the scenes stories, special offers and more.



Subscribe now and receive either a free gift or a free issue
Powered by SMF 2.0 RC1 | SMF © 2006–2009, Simple Machines LLC

Template Design By Nuno Guerra