http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=404899Perhaps this is an answer about Archaelogy and Ideology ?
Personally as an religious person i dont agree with the Biblical Paragraph.
I think as it is placed now in the Times its coloured and biased by anti Biblical visions influenced by the present, ( Anti Biblism prominent nowdays in England !! ) exactly as the author says that present is misused to colour our past.
The whole article is a big charade to attack the Bible wrapped in some remarks about Maya Inca and other history.
I could write an better article as I did in another Forum
As i will copy here
::::
History is even more subjective and misused .
But Archaelogical Interpretation is ... History dicipline.
Perhaps the methods of archaelogy are scientific and it is a autonomous dicipline ( but surely not objective ) but the interpretation is part of the historians trade.!!!
The Archaelogists deliver the amunition to the historians .( politicians etc ).
In reflecting the article it occured to me that indeed Marija Gimbutas and here Kurgan thesis ,here great Goddess theory, etc etc
and the feministic archaelogy of here more extreme followers ( Rian Eisler etc ) are modern vieuws about Gender, Women , Males etc projected to the past.!!!!
Exactly as the article postulates.
see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimbutas http://www.debunker.com/patriarchy.html#goddess but also contrary defending Gimbutas etc
http://www.suppressedhistories.net/articles/articles.html For Indo and Proto Indo European studies you have the same problem present thinking/idyals
influence the vision of the past .
In India the Archaelogy of The Sanskrit Aryan period is very hotly debated as it is coloured by present ideoogical visions.About the importance and role of the Aryans etc
See Indo Aryan Migrations link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration. and
http://micheldanino.voiceofdharma.com/indus.html And an classic example is Greece versus Turkey and its influence on Archaelogy and History .
Was Greece populated from the North or From Asia Minor. ?
And Cypriotic Archaelogy .
The problem is very old.For instance :
Caesar deliberately misused Geography/History for his ends in the Gallic wars.
:::::
The author stumbled in his own trap !!!!
Showing what he really likes !!!!
The Tragic Comedy is that a devout Muslim also would never never deny King David or King Solomon as they are very highly esteemed in the Koran.!!!!!!
Turanclancath:)