Biblical Archaeology ReviewHomeSubscribe
+  The Biblical Archaeology Society Forum
|-+ 
General Biblical Archaeology Discussion Topics

| |-+  Artifacts/Texts
| | |-+  calendar dates to Gilgamesh text
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: calendar dates to Gilgamesh text  (Read 139 times)
Elijah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 842



View Profile Email
« on: Sep 25, 2009, 03:05 PM »

A discussion with a person whose chat screen name was Gilgamesh yesterday led me to realize i had the Gilgamesh dates in the form of Chinese calendar. It is the same dates as Noah's rise to heaven 40 days after death. That is the only way they would confuse the 1st year of Gilgemesh, with his last year 126 years later, and with Noah's death, and with the two calendars (year calendar and day calendar) as if to be the same year when they are distinctly two separate, that of the visit to Noah at Peleg's death, and that of Noah's death. Thus 8-9 years 2029-2020 BC (last year Gilgamesh to dead Noah) is confused as 480 years 2637-2157 BC (dead Noah to 1st year Gilgemesh). Understand that Egyptian 365-day starts on 2030 BC July 17 (Noah’s 9-19-944) as Zoroaster Persian Pamenot 1, and Chinese starts the next year in 2029 BC July 16 (Noah’s 9-24-945) as Zoroaster Persian Pamenot 1. And from this they note in 1437 BC that Venus rising with Sothis on 9-27-945 (July 19 Pamenot 4) and on 11-27-945 (Sep 17) to presume this 60-day cycle was created then for July 19 when in fact it was created 40 days after Noah died, ending those 40 days on 5-27-954 (Feb 2 of 2020 BC) as the 40 days of the Flood ended the same day name on 3-27-600 (Jan 6 of 2369 BC). This was the prelude to accrediting 2157 BC Feb 2 (5-27-815) in the 1st year of Gilgamesh and claiming it measured from Noah’s death and calendar in 2637 BC Feb 2 (a false calculation of 5-27-328) because it goes before the true astral impact shifting the Earth in 2370 BC not Chinese 2953 BC.

Gilgamesh visited Noah (caution: unknown whether this date is when he left Ereck, or arrived at Ararat, or arrived at Kittim Cyprus, or returned to Ereck) on the date March 27 of 2030 BC. It is before Peleg Mesanipada dies around the set of Sothis (May 5-8). The reason is because March 27 is the date in 360-day calendar 5-27, the same as Noah's 40-day seance 2020 BC Feb 2 (5-27-954), it is the same as the 1st year of Gilagmesh 126 years (2157-2031 BC) when Feb 2 is 5-27-815, and marks Noah's Chinese death and Chinese calendar as 2637 BC Feb 2 (5-27-328). The Chinese year calendar started in 2029 BC as 8 years before Noah's death in 2021 BC where upon the 60-day calendar was started in 2020 BC Feb 2 on 5-27-954. But on Feb 2 of 1437 BC (11-27-1545) with rising Venus the Feb 2 of 2020 BC (5-27-954) became ignored in the beleif that the 60-day calendar began with Venus rising with Sothis in 2029 BC (Zoroaster Persian Pamenot 4 on July 19 as 9-27-945 and 60 days to Venus still a morningstar on 11-27-945 on Sep 17). This was the year after Gilgamesh went to Noah, and the year after Peleg died, and is the year of the Nahor Alumdug /Haran Meskalumdug family suicides in Ur. Thus the year calendar that began with the death of Peleg and the journey of Gilgamesh to Noah in his last year 2030 BC (Egypt 2030 BC, China 2029 BC), was confused as being the same time as the 60-day calendar at the death of Noah's 40-day resurrection 9 years later in 2020 BC. This 2030 BC is the last year of Gilgemesh as king, not the last year of Noah. So when the year 2637 BC Feb 2 (mis-retrocalc of 5-27-328) matches the 1st year of Gilgamesh 2157 BC Feb 2 (5-27-815), they assume Gilgamesh went into seance with Noah in his 1st year as king (2157 BC), and that the calendar and Noah's death occurred in 2637 BC solely becauseof matching dates in 480 years despite i only being 316 years (not 350) after Chinese Flood 2953 , and only 320 x 360 days, and is 360-day calendar year 328 (not 320).
================
So I went to Gilgamesh in wikipedia. And rather than have my writing removed so often by them, I put it in the discussion page....

The Rod
Simple logic. Google the word rod and cubit and there is no set world standard for the rod. Various sizes are  given. Why do scholars defy simple logic. It seems very clear that a rod would be just that, a pole or stick, or branch that is not going to be 12 cubits long (10 rods = 10x 12 cubits = 120 cubits); it makes more sense that a rod is 3 cubits, and correctly defines a height of the ark as 10 rods thus 30 cubits, not 4 times bigger. As with the sumerian king list where a sar is 3600 days they say it is 3600 years merely due to one priest of Babylon who says it is, despite 8 sars of 8 decades being 28,800 days (not years) for the first king. This same practical logic (also questions why Wikipedia here puts a favored translation ahead of all other translations as an ALTERNATIVE heading). What right does WHO have to put a favored translation ahead of others as the truth proposed above and before the other ones?
Comparison between Chinese Gilgamesh and Hebrew Gilgamesh dates
Hebrew Flood starts 360-day calendar on Julian 2370 BC Oct 12 as 1-01-600 (his new year 600 from the calendar new year 1 after his birth) equal to Adams year 1656. If traced back to Chinese Flood 2953 BC it falls on April 15 with the 7th month on Oct 12 proving their awareness of Sothic Oct 12. The span is 592 years of 360 days, which is reminiscent of the fact that a Venus half-cycle is 600 egyptian years(600x 365 days = 75x 584 days minus 30 days to average 583.92 days noted as 2 days every 40 years) that the Chinese of 1437 BC Feb 2 mistake an 8-year Venus of 592x 365 days as being 600x 360 days from 2029-1437 BC. Mistaking 600 egyptian years (x365 days) of Venus as 592 egyptian years (x 365 days) because it is 600x 360days, also implies negligence can go further and mistake Venus as 592x 360 days, thus 2953 BC instead of 2370 BC since both years will have an Oct 12 for 1st month and 7th month swapped.
NOAHS DEATH in 2020 BC starts the 60-day calendar (within 360 days) on Feb 2 as 5-27-954. But in Chinese NOAHS DEATH starts the 60-day calendar (within 360 days) as 2637 BC on Feb 2 as 5-27-328 which is 316 years after Flood 2953 BC whose April 15 is year 08. Original Gilgamesh version #1 refers to Noah alone and single (as widower) being sought out by Gilgamesh to ask why all people are dying and not Noah. This places Gilgamesh as dropping his 126 year rule (2157-2031 BC) to go find Noah in 2030 BC who then AFTER Gilgamesh dies (at the current world longevity of 239) then too does die himself at 949 in 2021 BC, accredited with 950 in 2020 BC. Version #2 says he died long before Gilgamesh was born, 350 years Flood 2957-2907 BC, 350 years Flood 2947-2897 BC, or until Chinese calendar as Flood 2953-2637 BC. And so his wife is there in the underworld with Noah despite this visit being 440-480 years later and the two still have risen to heaven. The 40-day resurrection of Noah is the same 360-day calendar dates whether 2638 BC Dec 24 to 2637 BC Feb 2 (as 60-day calendar inauguration) or the Hebrew 2021 BC Dec 24 to 2020 BC Feb 2 (60-day calendar inauguration). (4-17-328 to 5-27-328 versus 4-17-954 to 5-27-954). The seance in Babel to speak to dead Noah as spirit Xisuthros in 2020 BC is thus 10 years after Gilgamesh spoke to him in 2030 BC. But the Chinese version has Gilgamesh campaign for Noah in his 1st year 2157 BC because it matches 2637 BC and 2157 BC not only as the same date of the 360-day calendar, but also as the same 60-year Julian calendar year name on Feb 2 of both years. This spans 480 years from 2637-2157 BC (as 487 x360 days as 5-27-328 to 5-27-815) of Noah and wife waiting in paradise hell just for Gilgamesh to visit before they get to go to heaven. Since the visit of Gilgamesh is after his last year and thus in 2030 BC, his visit might be presumed to be the same 360-day date (5-27-944 on Mar 27 of 2030 BC). Thus equating 1-27 with Nov 27 and 5-27 with Mar 27 retaining the ALL SAINTS DAY memorial 360-day new year Nov 1. If his flight to Noah was March 27, then because all indications equate Peleg Mesanipada as dying with the set of the star Sothis (May 6-8 of 2030 BC) including the suicide of Nahor Alumdug and Haran Meskalumdug as evdidence of the same dates a year later (Koyak 25 = May 6 of 2029 BC) then this means the death of king Gilgamesh's buddy occurred before the death of Peleg Mesanipada between 2031 BC Nov 1 and 2030 BC March 27.
Hebrew Adam 1656 = Noah 600, but 600 years later the natural years are 2256 while the 360-day calendar is 1208. Regarding the Flood 2953 BC as year 2256 thus has no error in the eyes of Chinese who se it calculates as year 08 despite being a Noah who is 600 not 608. They easily see his 600 years before Flood (Thoth 1 from 3552 BC Jan 28-2953 BC Aug 31) as also egyptian years and thus 608 in 360-day calendar (2953 BC Apr 15 to 2637 BC Sep 3 as 1-01-08 to 1-01-328 where 320x 360 days span 316 years). Note the new year Sep 3 of 2637 BC matches that after Noah's death as 2020 BC Sep 4 the year of Pharaoh unification 1-01-955 just 52 days after Egyptian new year 350 on Pamenot 1 July 14 (epagum July 9).


Reason for not eating plant
I have removed the clause that the reason he didn't eat the plant immediately was because he wanted to share it with older elders of Uruk. The entire reason that Gilgamesh went on his journeys was to try to bring Enkidu back to life. The reason he didn't eat the plant was because he wanted to use it to bring Enkidu back to life. Not because he wanted to share it with other elders of Uruk. Wjhonson (talk) 06:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Interesting, I never thought of it, but both are correct. So you should put it back in. The kings are getting old and dying, and they all in need to be saved. This is why, it is because it was unique, no one had yet died old after the Flood. The kings are appointed elders of cities. The reason they must be appointed is because an elder occurs by getting old, but if young and appointed, you are then made an elder or a king when you are not old. Someone is daring to say you are as wise as older ones. However, as if punished for being made elders when they are young and not old, the sudden rapid aging starts aging them... is this reward as elders to look old, or punishment taking their lives for daring to take kingship or accepting the roles! And their parents who now look as if to be gods who can live 400 years, what do they think? Are these sons good or bad. Is it the serpent, or God doing this.

Thus in short Genesis, the kings are young. In short Genesis Reu (Aanipada) is ony 32 years old when his son Serug is born in 2207 BC and Reu is given the role as elder over the whole house, his name Reu Aanipada ruling 80 years until he is 112 in 2127 BC. He then lives 127 more years until he is 239 dying in 2000 BC, the 9 years of king Ur Nammu. This version is countered by NeoBabylon chronology which places him as king the same year 2207 BC but his father Peleg Mesanipada has died that year at 339. Thus Reu is already 209, and rules 80 years to 289 to the same year 2127 BC, and lives only 50 years more to 2077 BC. Oddly, the birth year of Haran in the Hebrew version, being used as a reborn into heaven for Reu.
« Last Edit: Sep 25, 2009, 03:19 PM by Elijah » Logged

ELIJAH
of 1996 back now in 2008
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  
Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
 
Subscribe to BAR


FREE ISSUE!

Try an issue of the world’s leading publication of Biblical archaeology at no obligation.
Try us now!








Get Bible and archaeology news, behind the scenes stories, special offers and more.



Subscribe now and receive either a free gift or a free issue
Powered by SMF 2.0 RC1 | SMF © 2006–2009, Simple Machines LLC

Template Design By Nuno Guerra