Biblical Archaeology ReviewHomeSubscribe
+  The Biblical Archaeology Society Forum
|-+ 
General Biblical Archaeology Discussion Topics

| |-+  Archaeologists, Scholars & Other Personalities
| | |-+  Biblical Archaeology/Archaeologists in General
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Biblical Archaeology/Archaeologists in General  (Read 1611 times)
turanclancath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 430



View Profile Email
« on: Nov 16, 2009, 11:54 PM »

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/court_and_social/article6917740.ece

A very interesting article for Biblical Archaeology / Archaeologists in general.

turanclancath :)
Logged

Turanclancath/aka Don Turan :)

Let the 4 Queens rule the World.
You reign from here to Eternity.
Queen of Queens,Empress of Empresses.
notopri
Guest


Email
« Reply #1 on: Jan 08, 2010, 02:33 PM »

The link doesn't work for me
Logged
turanclancath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 430



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: Jan 08, 2010, 11:47 PM »

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/court_and_social/article6917740.ece?print=yes&randnum=1263019560000

Perhaps the link opens in this way?  hope so .
Turanclancath :)
Logged

Turanclancath/aka Don Turan :)

Let the 4 Queens rule the World.
You reign from here to Eternity.
Queen of Queens,Empress of Empresses.
notopri
Guest


Email
« Reply #3 on: Jan 10, 2010, 07:23 PM »

Finally got it. It took two computers but I was able to finally connect. Thank you
Logged
notopri
Guest


Email
« Reply #4 on: Jan 10, 2010, 07:31 PM »

Quote
Ultimately, biblical archaeology is not about proving or disproving the Bible: archaeologists are more concerned with reconstructing the culture and history of the Holy Land.”

What rght do these people have to reconstruct the culture and history of the Holy Land?  Who says their version is better, after all they are basing their ideas upon minute, fragmented evidence discovered 2,000 years or so after the fact?

Talk about arrogance and idiocy.  To think that looking at broken walls, missing buildings, no texts and other mis-shapen evidence would allow one to construct a history over those who were actually there. Rubbish and ridiculous.

Logged
notalent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 544


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: Jan 10, 2010, 10:43 PM »

Quote
Ultimately, biblical archaeology is not about proving or disproving the Bible: archaeologists are more concerned with reconstructing the culture and history of the Holy Land.”

Who says their version is better, after all they are basing their ideas upon minute, fragmented evidence discovered 2,000 years or so after the fact?

Talk about arrogance and idiocy.  To think that looking at broken walls, missing buildings, no texts and other mis-shapen evidence would allow one to construct a history over those who were actually there. Rubbish and ridiculous.

Well, they have to do something with the material they discover.  What would you suggest they do with it? 

;)
Logged
notopri
Guest


Email
« Reply #6 on: Jan 11, 2010, 01:50 AM »

Quote
Well, they have to do something with the material they discover.  What would you suggest they do with it?

An unbeliever i see.
Logged
notalent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 544


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: Jan 11, 2010, 09:01 AM »

Quote
Well, they have to do something with the material they discover.  What would you suggest they do with it?

An unbeliever i see.

It's a simple question.  What do you suggest?
Logged
notopri
Guest


Email
« Reply #8 on: Jan 11, 2010, 01:57 PM »

Answer it yourself, then and while you do that, answer mine honestly and stop turning it around on me.
Logged
notalent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 544


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: Jan 11, 2010, 02:43 PM »

Answer it yourself, then and while you do that, answer mine honestly and stop turning it around on me.
I'm a believer.  Your turn. 
Logged
turanclancath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 430



View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: Jan 12, 2010, 09:23 AM »

http://www.sciencecodex.com/most_ancient_hebrew_biblical_inscription_deciphered

Great Archaelogical discovery !
Turanclancath :) or simple DON
Logged

Turanclancath/aka Don Turan :)

Let the 4 Queens rule the World.
You reign from here to Eternity.
Queen of Queens,Empress of Empresses.
notalent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 544


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: Jan 12, 2010, 10:12 AM »

http://www.sciencecodex.com/most_ancient_hebrew_biblical_inscription_deciphered

Great Archaelogical discovery !
Turanclancath :) or simple DON
Wonderful discovery.  Thanks for posting!
Logged
notopri
Guest


Email
« Reply #12 on: Jan 15, 2010, 01:56 PM »

Quote
Great Archaelogical discovery !

I was reading a follow up article today onYahoo about how Gail was saying that this may prove that some of the Bible was written far earlier than the Minimalists claim.

My first thought when I read that was, archaeologists and scientists are arriving at the point where theologians and true christians have been all along.

We know that parts of the Bible were written  earlier than the 4-6th centuries BC but those who do not want to believe it or deal with its message of salvation just do not want it proven true.
Logged
turanclancath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 430



View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: Jan 15, 2010, 09:00 PM »

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34880397/ns/technology_and_science-science/

More on the Oldest Hebrew .
Turanclancath :)
Logged

Turanclancath/aka Don Turan :)

Let the 4 Queens rule the World.
You reign from here to Eternity.
Queen of Queens,Empress of Empresses.
notopri
Guest


Email
« Reply #14 on: Jan 15, 2010, 10:00 PM »

from your link:

Quote
Until now, many scholars have held that the Hebrew Bible originated in the 6th century B.C., because Hebrew writing was thought to stretch back no further.

I forget which book i found it in but it mentioned that people , especially those on the secular side of things, tend to think that writing started the moment the text or artifact was dated. They do not realize that the text or artifact was the result of long practiced writing previous to the inscription's date.

So now that we have a 10th century text, per se, we can conclude that the Israelis knew how to write and practiced it long before the 10th century BC. and I am of the school of thought which does not limit literacy to the scribes.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  
Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
 
Subscribe to BAR


FREE ISSUE!

Try an issue of the world’s leading publication of Biblical archaeology at no obligation.
Try us now!








Get Bible and archaeology news, behind the scenes stories, special offers and more.



Subscribe now and receive either a free gift or a free issue
Powered by SMF 2.0 RC1 | SMF © 2006–2009, Simple Machines LLC

Template Design By Nuno Guerra