Home | Library | Forum | Digs | Travel/Study | Store | Subscribe
Ultimately, biblical archaeology is not about proving or disproving the Bible: archaeologists are more concerned with reconstructing the culture and history of the Holy Land.”
QuoteUltimately, biblical archaeology is not about proving or disproving the Bible: archaeologists are more concerned with reconstructing the culture and history of the Holy Land.” Who says their version is better, after all they are basing their ideas upon minute, fragmented evidence discovered 2,000 years or so after the fact?Talk about arrogance and idiocy. To think that looking at broken walls, missing buildings, no texts and other mis-shapen evidence would allow one to construct a history over those who were actually there. Rubbish and ridiculous.
Well, they have to do something with the material they discover. What would you suggest they do with it?
QuoteWell, they have to do something with the material they discover. What would you suggest they do with it?An unbeliever i see.
Answer it yourself, then and while you do that, answer mine honestly and stop turning it around on me.
http://www.sciencecodex.com/most_ancient_hebrew_biblical_inscription_decipheredGreat Archaelogical discovery !Turanclancath or simple DON
Great Archaelogical discovery !
Until now, many scholars have held that the Hebrew Bible originated in the 6th century B.C., because Hebrew writing was thought to stretch back no further.
Try an issue of the world’s leading publication of Biblical archaeology at no obligation.Try us now!
Get Bible and archaeology news, behind the scenes stories, special offers and more.
Offer valid in U.S. only. Canadian & International Subscriptions
Template Design By Nuno Guerra