on my website, someone posted the following article by william dever and as i read it i came across this tidbit which i would like to discuss further here:
http://www.bib-arch.org/bswb_BAR/indexBAR.asp?PubID=BSBA&Volume=34&Issue=2&ArticleID=11As a result of this article in BAR, we learned of another important house shrine in a private collection that should figure prominently in the debate about whether Yahweh had a consort.
The owner wishes to remain anonymous, lest he be subject to the vitriol the establishment now commonly heaps on collectors. Professor Dever, who is retired and therefore not subject to academic retribution, has agreed to discuss this house shrine here, but only if we “publish” it first.
i have bolded the words which are the subject of this topic and it concerns me that such fears and actions are present in a community supposedly out to find truth and what really happened inthe past.
what i gather from those two sentences is that the academics are only going to allow what they want to be released and nothing else. kind of reminds me of what evolutionary scientists do to those who contradict their theory.
to me this is seen as childish and censorship but i would like to hear from others what they think or know this entails.