Mayan date discovered in Amizaduga

[Elijah]

The following date is not a logged Venus date, but it does exist as the last Venus of Amizaduga whose inferior cross in Dec 1626 BC rising in January 1625 BC continues as the morning star of April 3 (Gregorian equinox March 20). This Gregorian March 20 equinox is 100 days after the Mayan new year tun (in 1626 BC on a date which later becomes the Greek December 25). TWO years earlier that new year tun was the actual solstice of Gregorian Dec 21 of 1628 BC (which equals Julian Jan 4 of 1627 BC).
I have been looking for Venus dates without success, and it looks here as if Mayan relationship with Amizaduga is between winter solstice and spring equinox. But no matter how many rude people attempt to humiliate and discredit me, my reward always comes to me in this way because i am willing to see that it was not a Venus connection but a solstice/equinox between Amizaduga and the Maya. The constant reminders in personal life with a pat on the head and a hankerchief saying Look Ya gotta move on, put it behind you, are from people who thrive to see you as the unachiever while in their eyes they succeed exalted in what they think they know. When they say move on, they dont mean your studies and research, they mean your family, or friends, or issues or problems. They mean emotions, when perhaps they cause many bad emotions in your social circle by what they say about your research and studies. So my point is, if the Venus date was there, or is there, it'll show up in due time, God knows i obsess enough to find it. But meanwhile, this has surfaced as the Mayan seasonal date. I deserve no credit, because truth is it's been 2 years since i realized the 744 years was part of the seasonal formula. And i could be accused of neglecting the search for it sooner during these 2 years. The sothic star Sothis 720+720+20=1460 years equates as 365 leap days in two 720-year units of 180 leap days, so too seasonally the sun leaps 744 + 744 + 20 = 1508 where 744 years are 180 leap days. And 744 is Flood 2370 BC to 1626 BC,
but also is Flood 3114 BC to 2370 BC.

It is this date that i have found that my discovered 360-day constant of Noah's calendar equates the two calendars from Noah's true new year. That equinox date is in Noah's calendar the date of:

the 1st day of the 5th month of year 1355 in the 360-day calendar.
This is equated in the Mayan tun (of 360 days) as
the 1st day of uinal 5 of tun 1510
The Mayan new year tun is always 20 days after Noah's new year.
And the Mayan tun is 155 more than Noah's.
(example year 1355 plus 155 = Mayan year 1510 tun from Flood 3114 BC)
True Flood year 600 plus 155 = Mayan year 755 from Flood 3114 BC
Do notice the year 1510 which implies that 2 years after their Flood that 1508 tun were applied as seasonal for what is correctly a 1508 haab formula. There are 20 more tun than haab.
1440 haab = 1460 tun and are 20 years less than 1460 haab
where 1461 haab = 1460 Julian years
This same 20-year difference exists for the
1488 haab which are about 1508 tun and are 20 years before
1508 haab which = 1507 Gregorian years

It should be noted that from Flood year 600 in 2370 BC
when the disaster created and started difference between all years
that 744 haab of 365 days will equal 755 tun.
So the true year 1344 equates as year 1355.
Year 1344 is 600 before Flood (2970-2370 BC)
and 744 after the Flood (2370-1626 BC)
But in Mayan correlation they equate year 1344
as being Noah's count from the Flood (3114-1770 BC).
There are three major significance to both Hamurabi's 1770 BC
and Amizaduga's 1626 BC. Both measure 1200 years. The 1770 BC
is 1200 years from Noah's birth, but you will see the Maya think
1770 BC is thrice 1200 (or 3600) from Adam. But it is 1626 BC that is
twice 1200 (or 2400) from Adam.
The year 1770 BC is Adam's 2256 AM, and if they predicted astral
event for year 6000 it would be an additional 3744 years.
The Maya too predict a king for astral event as 3744 years after
the Flood of 3114 BC. This implies that the Maya regard the Flood
of 3114 BC as Adam's year 2256. Then add 1344 years to the Flood
and the Maya have year 3600 as 1344 years after the Flood, and
in 1770 BC. When the true year 1344 is in 1626 BC.
It would mean they had taken Amizaduga's 1200 year cycle of
1626 BC, and instead continued that cycle from the Venus of
1770 BC as if to be year 3600, and another 2400 to 630 AD.

The seasonal relationship is shown in the chart i drew up yesterday
in the calendrical relationship the Maya have with all Genesis chronologies in the world.... as well as those that evolved into Hindu, and Chinese,
and Japanese, and are denied to have connection.

This again dates the Maya.
All of this is totally from prePersian millenium.
The 3744-year countdown (Judah) from 2256 AM 1770 BC,
is shown by the Maya to be units of 312 years,
as in 312 BC to AD to 312 AD. And in Mayan correlation,
from 3114 BC as 2256 AM will fall on 1554 BC when Moses was 40
and in dispute with all the schools of Egypt to the point of killing
someone in a fight. This 1554 BC matches the publishing
that one Stonehenge book pointed out will match lunar-solar
56 year aubrey holes for the eclipse of Jan 4. Thus proving what
most already believe of a population in Britain. But not knowing this
is Adam's year 2472 (72 years after Amizaduga) that it means
the remainder to 6000 is divisible by an artifical 56 year calendar.
Now if Britain fixed 1554 BC, it is no surpirse the Maya did too.
But they deemed it as the 312-year cycle, not 56.

Persia is then 1000 years old for the 7th year of the rule of Cyrus
(1554- 554 BC). No actual event is known for 1560 BC.
Although, this very moment
i can see that equating 12th dynasty and Abram of 75 as 1991 BC
(instead of 1943 BC) does cause the belief in the Egyptian Ramses
Papyrus of the exodus being 1561 BC (instead of 1513 BC).
Cyrus could easily have taken his rule in 560 BC as being
what he thought was 1000 years after the Exodus. So therefore
with God having set free the Jews from Egypt in what he mistook
to be 1560 BC, his rule in 560 BC would pursue freeing the Jews
from Babylon in the belief that his rule began an exact 1000 years.
I have no doubt that Cyrus had heard by many
that his name was the same as the Savior declared in the Jews
book of Isaiah. There is no proof that Isaiah meant anything other then sun rising when he wrote the word cyrus. But the names in our lives move us to do things. The best know Mexican archeo-astronomer became involved because his mother-in-laws name was Maya.
Even i am influenced by knowing the meanings of my mother's
name Gloria, my name Richard, and middle name Michael.

Perhaps it is good that Daniel did NOT go around (the night before
Babylon was taken) predicting it would happen, or else the
gates in the river would have been closed to prevent it.
INSERT FOOT IN MY MOUTH
Do note it was already in progress, when he announced it,
the finger on the wall. I am not so sure that just because a
finger wrote on the wall, that it means they saw the finger
in the process of doing the writing.

[eliyahu hanavi]

Cool, I suppose?? However, the Flood Story in Genesis was using a Luni-Solar calendar as indicated by the two separate verses of the ground drying (i.e. 8:13 and 8:14 I believe). Calculating from the beginning to both endings yields 354 days for a lunar calendar reckoning and the 365th day for a solar reckoning. Therefore, a fixed 360 day reckoning was not being used unless you just wish to take the average between lunar and solar to derive 360.

The rest is just a bunch of dates that are not tied together in any coherent manner. I'll ask for 175 grains for your thoughts, but I'll give you 17,500 in return.

[Elijah]

Cool, I suppose?? However, the Flood Story in Genesis was using a Luni-Solar calendar as indicated by the two separate verses of the ground drying (i.e. 8:13 and 8:14 I believe). Calculating from the beginning to both endings yields 354 days for a lunar calendar reckoning and the 365th day for a solar reckoning. Therefore, a fixed 360 day reckoning was not being used unless you just wish to take the average between lunar and solar to derive 360.

Well, it doesnt take a scholar to say or notice that giving the date 1-01-601 at Gen:8:13 as a new year doesnt claim its a new moon, nor does anything prove whether that is 360 days or 354 days. Neither one of us wins or loses on that verse. But of course you claim it proves it is 354 days, and the majority of human minds can see it proves neither calendar. It is clear that opening the door on the new year didnt force or make the drained outside world sensable enough to step out on the mud just because its the new year. Yet later on the date 2-27-601 it says it was dry enough to step out. That too doesnt prove whether 360-day nor 354- day calendar. Using a 360-day calendar in th emiddle of 355 and 365 doesnt mean someone desired to use 5 days more than 355 and 5 days less than 365 as an average. Such is simple presumption with no further evidence.

Your claim of a 354 day lunar calendar and 365 day solar calendar, you do not present with proof (by presenting those two scriptures). Listing those verses has no implication of that theory. And the common claim of 354 day and 365 day year is not yours but that of others, so i will clarify it for you. It presumes that in a 365-day calendar, that an event that spans one year from date 2-17 to 2-17, if the original date were 2-17 in both lunar and 365 day calendars, then the latter closing date of 2-17 would be the lunar date 2-27. HOWEVER, both calendars of three cultures, the 365-day Mayan, the 365-day Egyptian, the 360-day Chinese (60-day calendar), and the 360-day Mayan all verify that the 365-day and 360-day have NEVER shared an equivalent date, as the moon can by meandering all over the place. And yet these cultures have those calendars counting from the Flood year. Sorry, but if the Maya count a 360-day calendar as their father Noah, then i too shall see that 360-day calendar as existing. I have no problem with a publisher wanting to bind it as a book and put it in the stores.

Concerned with what Genesis uses, and it clearly states it uses 150 days from 2-17 to 7-17 being both 5 calendar months and 150 days (each of 30 days for 5 months concecutively straight). There is no lunar calendar that will use five months of 30 days constant. It does prove a 360-day calendar year because the moon is 59 days for every 2 months, making 4 months as 118 days and a 5th would be 147 or 148. So you have no proof of lunar-solar year. In fact 6 months is 177 days and so only 27 days beyond the 5th month. Now you can say oh but thats a sidereal month in 27 days, but who is going to use 5 months of 30 days and then switch to a 6th month of 27 days. Your grains fall thru all hands. And i certainly will not expect of myself to tell someone with 17,500 grains where they can find 150 days in Genesis or the dates 2-17 and 7-17. I suggest you look up the things you beleive, I do. This reply is for others who know truth when they hear it.

PS. For others, you might be interested to know that by mere coincidence Noah's 1-01-601 of his 360-day calendar did fall on the absent new moon of Oct 6 in 2369 BC (Greg Sep 16). I find it amazing that you coukl be fed a home-made dinner, and tell the cook that it was fennel not basil they put in the meal, and then not even be able to pic out what basil or fennel looks like, no willing to point it out in the dinner or on the spice rack. It is truly really disgusting to face this.

The rest is just a bunch of dates that are not tied together in any coherent manner. I'll ask for 175 grains for your thoughts, but I'll give you 17,500 in return.

Nothing is coherent to those who dont listen. Those who did not follow Jesus, chose not to, because their hearts saw him as incoherent. Those who killed him felt nothing was incoherent on their part in the reasons they did it to him. I dont feel that your judging the material as coherent or incoherent is proof of what it is or not connected in calendars. Anyone who truly knows calendars will see it. But it does prove what YOU wish to see it as. I know of books published by scholars who claim the Mayan 365 days had a leap year with a 6th Uayeb day (AND MOST KNOW THATS NOT TRUE, NEVER HAS BEEN). SIMPLE FACT IS YOU DONT LOOK AT. If you cant see the tie between two Gregorian dates of March 20 or Dec 21 in 744 years, thats not my incoherency, it is yours. I am fully capable of looking at Sitchin and seeing how he translates Sumerian without my beleiving as he does that they were all from the spaceship in the spaceport that Abraham guarded. I doubt i will get the same honest respect from you in what i present, that i happily willingly give to such sci-fi like Sitchin despite my knowing his spaceship theory is eccentric from reality. I wonder where the few are who appreciate what they read.

[Elijah]

Africanus.GIF enhanced replacement