chart for Maya from Noah is easier to show you as JPG

[Elijah]

JPG of Noah dying in 2020 BC as the world's christ savior who saved the world (his family) thru Armageddon Flood of 2370 BC and became Mayan New Year date.

[Elijah]

the calendar year of Noah's death Mayan and Egyptian

[Elijah]

To convert from Mayan to Noah's calendar.
Noah's calendar begins with his birth in 2970 BC so that the Flood is Noah's year 600 in 2370 BC. The Mayan instead regard 2370 BC as the city Ur and 744 years (haab) after Noah's calendar begins with Flood year 3114 BC. Thus the 744 haab before the real true Flo od is calculated as having Julian days which will span 755 tun (755 of 360 days). So add 755 to Noah's year and you get Mayan year.
Example:
2370 BC Oct 31 is 1-20-600 = Mayan date  Year 1355: 0.0
2370 BC Nov 1  is 1-21-600 = Mayan date  Year 1355: 0.1
Caution: Noahs new year changes 20 days before Mayan new year.
Thus Mayan year 5200: 0.0  (13 baktun = 13.0.0:0.0)
in 2012 AD
is Noahs new year 4445 but 20 days before Mayan new year.

= = Noah's date minus 20 days is Mayan date = =
Example: Noah 1-20 minus 20 days is Mayan 1.0
Example: Noah 1-21 minus 20 days is Mayan 1.1
Example: Noah 2-09 minus 20 days is Mayan 1.19
Example: Noah 2-10 minus 20 days is Mayan 2.0
Example: Noah 5-01 minus 20 days is Mayan 5.1
Example: Noah 5-19 minus 20 days is Mayan 5.19

= = Mayan date plus 20 days is Noahs date = =
Example: Mayan 1. 9 plus 20 days is Noah's 1-29
Example: Mayan 1.10 plus 20 days is Noah's 1-30
Example: Mayan 1.11 plus 20 days is Noah's 2-01
Example: Mayan 1.19 plus 20 days is Noah's 2-09
Example: Mayan 2.00 plus 20 days is Noah's 2-10

Though Noah's calendar counts years from his birth, we cannot and should not (until an astral genius comes along) calculate dates before the real true Flood of our Earth shifted by asteroid impact. Thus for true conversion between Mayan and Noah, this exists only from the real Flood year 2370 BC onward. Mayan miscalculation is 3114 BC for the creation of this current world by Noah's Flood.

Mayan new year of their tun (360 days) has a zero date every year. It is important to say date not day because the dates are in the calendar year (20 of these dates, zero thru 19); and they each have a name, date zero is named Ahau, date 1 is named Imix, etc. But the days are also numbered 1 thru 13 so that date 5 and day 5 are not the same, and it is date 5 that has a name. Dates 14 thru 19 have names, but there is no day 14 thru day 19. And so confusion can occur only for the numbers 1 thru 13 if not careful.
Here is where we then have  those scholars who say Arabics and Mayan invented zero. Mayan zero day is called Ahau, it means Lord, and it is not really zero because they  treat that day like the new year or next calendar year, having the same year number of the 359 days that follow, but the circle or zero means complete, so it is truly the last day, not first. The day after zero or Ahau, is day 1 of Its an argument or issue of perspective and matters not when the whole calendar is wrong. It is like arguing whether our ten numbers are 0 thru 9, and 10 thru 19, or they are 1 thru 10, and 11-20. The one thru ten is tangible in hand. Contrary to popular claim, it doesnt mean people were too stupid to have a zero, or think of a zero, or use zero. I have no doubts now at all that our word Zero comes from Zoroastrian marking the difference between division in 2030 BC and starting over on 1513 BC (exodus) by marking ZERO.
It means our system had placed the zero as that before having anything. It is our writing systen that puts zero before so as to shift our ten digits from a one thru ten to being a 0 thru 9, and thus have two digits (two symbols, two figures) 10 as our ten.
The BC/AD issue is not from having no zero in math or numbers, or having no zero created yet, or used, or known. The error of BC/AD is because AD was assumed as ordinal as first year AD, 2nd year, 3rd year.

Zero begins 1st year
1 year begins 2nd year
2 years begins 3rd year
3 years begins 4th year
As such we still have no zero before 1st year
because zero is the day or point before 1st year
not a whole year before 1st year.
So the problem is not the lie that we had no zero year
and now we do have a zero year. We still dont.
When astral science says
year zero as 1 BC  (1st year before)
or year -1 as 2 BC (2nd year before)
or year -2 as 3 BC (3rd year before)
it is because any event has a 1st year before
and a 1st year of it or a 1st year after it.
You do not have a zero year before an event.
You do not have a zero year forward from an event.
The math issue is resolved by seeing that its source of being created in 532 AD is not as 532nd year AD
but as 532 years AD (from what is now 1 BC Jan 1).
This is because Exiguus used 19x 28 years
and 28x 19 years which equals 532 years
not the 531 years to a 532nd year of 532 AD.

astral -2 = 3 BC (same if 2 year before or 2nd year before)
astral -1 = 2 BC (same if 1 year before or 1st year before)

Jesus (0) = 1 BC his first year

1 AD is 1 year of, not 1st year of
1 year   = 1 AD is 2nd year of not 1st year of

2 AD is 2 years of, not 2nd year of
2 year = 2 AD is 3rd year of not 2nd year of

532 AD is 532 years not 532nd year
532 years = 532 AD is 533rd year of nor 532nd year of

This makes people think we needed a zero year as his 1st year. But we dont because our numbers of AD already fit facts, and it is the modern BC system in error. If a christian writer said an event was 410 years and 2 months before christ, it is assumed you can just say 410 BC but being beyond 410 makes it year 411 BC. Years do not go backwards. What is said in historic placement is not actually used as a calendar. We do not pick the year 2020 AD as our Era and then say okay this is 11 before it, next year is 10 before it, next year is 9 before it. (An exception is the book of Mormon where an angel keeps coming back and saying okay now it is 600 years before Jesus, now it is 400 (?) before Jesus, now it is 200 (?) before Jesus. You will have the same problem that your new year for year 9 before it, is no longer 9 years the next day or week being less than 9 years but you are calling it Year 9. It is how math works.

Our modern results of 1500 years of error actually uses a system opposite of reality. In math, when you go backwards your 1 before and 1st before will be the same. And your 2 before and 2nd before will be the same. But instead we are screwed up because we have two systems using a -1 for 2 BC and a -2 for 3 BC, etc. Now in math going forward we do have two ways that exist, your 1st year progresses until you are 1, when your 2nd year begins, and you are 1 while this 2nd year progresses until you are 2. Thus forward there are two versions, 1st year is 0 not 1, then 1 year old is 2nd year, 2 year old is 3rd year. We are back wards, and we dont change because we would have to add the number 1 to all our years AD, and forward from today's change, but it was easier to subtract 1 for all the BC so that 3114 BC is the number -3113. For you astronomers, this is why for 30 years I have said, you calculate tropical and change it to both sidereal and anomalistic. Instead the sidereal is the true orientation of an orbit which should then be converted to tropical and anomalistic. Everyone ignores that error develops here in the way we do it. BEST EXAMPLE: Go to Google translator choose English to another language (example english to turkish). Type some english, then translate it. Now hit the little arrow between language choice, and it will reverse (as Turkish to english). Paste your unknown language into its own language box and translate it back to english, and it will show you whether the translation was good, or all babbling jibberish. You would have to paste like this before you translate, because I asked if it was good here in Turkey, and they said it was all crazy talk, meaning not translated right.
This is the same with astronomy for 25 years I have said to the Adler planetarium how we calculate astronomy backwards starting with a tropical year thinking there will accumulate no error.

[tentenforum]

quite confusing at first but it is, indeed, interesting to know about these facts you presented...
amazing!!!

if that's the case, how come other kind of calendars existed?
do you have any idea?

Business Voluntary Liquidation Help

[Elijah]

All the calendars in the world are a tree, with many branches off previous calendars. None were created first hand. And for those who choose to defy that fact, seeing only the inauguration of a calendar and not its source, they not only fail to pinpoint their inauguration date and any astral connection, they argue it with others, and they blind themselves to the many actual connections, and the astronomy. They fail to recognize that a rising star used will connect cultures. I pinpointed Volcano Cosiguina as the first Mayan settlement, and Copan as the first city by means of Sothis rising on July 1 instead of July 18 which places it 17 degrees south of Memphis Egypt in 1314-1313 BC (they regard it as 1800 years after Flood; Genesis Venus cycle 600+1200, and Genesis Sothis 340 +1460; the real 340 is Peleg's death in 1996 AM, and the real 600 is Judah's birth in 2256 AM; the Mayan 260 years between dates). ANYONE can take any current true cycle and push it back billions of years. If you push the 25,600 year precession cycle back 20 billion years, it does not mean the Earth is 20 billion years old, nor prove it. Thus no calendar can really be used before its real inauguration into existence. Gregorian 1582 AD was based on 325 AD, but it wasn't created in 325 AD, and due to the 400-year formula, the exact equal between Julian and Gregorian thus occurs before that, from 200-299 AD.

The first calendar was created before the Flood by the angels who materialized as men on Earth. (One reason the angels must be bound for the 1000 years is that God is restoring the preFlood physical laws by restoring a water canopy with another asteroid impact. The bad angels have not been able to materialize in the postFlood conditions, being blind to what factors have changed in pressure and air mixture. In the near future, they could materialize again when God restores the preFlood natures; thus he must bind them to prevent their doing so.) The altered deformed version of the ten kings (as 1266 years =456,000 days) before the Flood, seems to imply that when these angels came down they created this 360-day calendar in year 390 of Adam ending sar 39 and beginning sar 40. Their actual rule allowing a king of kings started at Methuselah's birth 970 years (97 sars before the Flood), and because Kichunna became king at Larsa (67 sars =241,200 days) 670 years before the Flood, then Noah's descendents at postFlood Larsa seem to think the first angel Alulim ruled at Larsa that year. Instead it is more probable that Enoch defied Kichunna, and so Alulim then dematerialized Enoch. Karma = it is Enoch's death that proves these 10 kings are not Adam thru Noah, because the 7th king of every list falls after Enoch died. When the Flood came in 2370 BC, the 40 days forced them back into heaven including the current last king of kings Xisuthros who when Noah died on Persian Mesor 14 (postExodus Egyptian Mesor 19) the eve of Dec 24 then Xisuthros appeared for 40 days in spirit at Babel claiming to be Noah building a 9x9x9 cube for an ark. These spirits are really funny aren't they. Maybe thats why they like to bite children or fondle women in their sleep. But this is a key to why Jesus stayed 40 days, and the bride if killed this year will also appear 40 days if she gets the message to be the sacrifice 40 days before astral impact.

The astral impact shifted Earth axis and spin etc. So that all current calendars and all postFlood calendars are longer than 360 days. Mayan day 1 which is Imix and is after day zero which is Ahau, is always on Noah's date 1-21 being 20 days after Noah's new year. Because of this, their new year for Mars (6 orbits in 13 years) is 700 days before the real new year Marduk. Thus 2368 BC Julian Oct 1 (Noah's 1-01)on day Imix is replaced with 3113 BC Julian Sep 2 day Imix (Mayan 1st of year on Noah's 1-21). 360 days earlier 3114 BC Julian Sep 8 is Greg Aug 13 which falls soon on 2012 AD Greg Dec 23.... the day before being day zero which is Ahau ironically called the 1st of years and months, when it  is the zero of them. The concept being that precision in time by hours and minutes keeps you with God and yet it didn't stop mass sacrifice, and games at Chichen Itza where the winner gets to go to heaven by being beheaded.

Because of Earth's shift by Noah's asteroid, though the 365-day calendar was not created until 340 years later in 2030 BC (on Pamenot 1), the calculations of years and days have always been counted as if starting with the Flood and 12th dynasty Egypt did recognize leap days. Seasons moved forward a date, they did not add this day. This is proven by major Eras counting back to the Flood, NeoBabylon 747 BC back to 2947 BC, Greek 776 BC using 2956 BC, Roman 753 BC using 2953 BC and using 720 years 180 leap days and 740 years 185 leap days. A MAJOR error I recently saw on a TV documentary took the 1460 years of the star Sothis and claimed it was a half cycle in 730 years (182.5 days?). No truth there at all. The calendar year is 360+5 days so that you must regard it as 180+180+5 or as 180+185. This creates what we find in chronology spans as 720 or 740, never 730. When it comes to ruling people for God and competing who will do this, Rome does this in 753 BC because it is 720 after Joshua enters Canaan in 1473 BC, and Babylon does this 6 years later in 747 BC as 720 years after  Israel declares itself in 1467 BC. The world is not stupid in what goes on in other nations.

The plagues by comet encounter at the Exodus were amplified by the fact that from Joseph (1738 BC) onward the Egyptians quit recognizing leaping seasons. Thus when 50-year old high priest Jannes analyzed 1601-1600 BC, the calendar seasons had shifted 35 days back. In disputing with Moses he insisted that the date Koyak 24 was Jan 7 in both 2029 BC and 1554 BC. in reality, the Jan 6 solstice of 2029 BC was Persian Mesor 24. In these 475 years there are 119 leap days of 4 lunar months. Koyak 24 of 2029 BC was the May 5 mass suicde of Ur by Nahor Alumdug and Haran Meskalumdug to take their families to heaven to start 144,000 kings under Peleg Mesanipada who died the year before. To them, dead Peleg now being 240 while Noah was alive at 940 meant God had a reason to take 700 years away from these special men.

Thus the Zoroaster calendar means Zero Star. It marks preExodus dates by allowing Thoth thru Mekir to be shifted 5 days at Exodus rather than the Egyptians who allow Pamenot thru Mesor to take the shift. In 388 BC they then move the 5 days to the month Koyak which is at Feb 26 (to Mar 3). Feb 26 is the new year of Noah's calendar when 12-year Jupiter was shown to Narmer (Nimrod) by his father Cush at 12 years old. It is also the date that Jupiter crosses Taurus horns in 2009 BC for those who wanted Jupiter to be Marduk instead of the rising July 8 Mars on Noah's new year 966 (which marked 365 years with a 364 year Mars; year 601 and year 602). Year 601 is 365 calendar years which span 360 years. The Eras of 776 /753 /747 /700 BC choose to believe 834 BC Marduk was not year 3192 AM but rather 2009 BC was or 300 years earlier (300 year kings of Babylon); Josephus uses 500 years (Moslem tradition of Nimrod's life, his Nimrod being 2509-2009 BC instead of the true 2270-1770 BC marked by rising Phoenix in Leo or Ash).

[Elijah]

Maya cross up two Venus observations.
The Venus observation by king Amizaduga at his death is a 584-day artificial calendar from May 1626 BC to Dec 1625 BC. The May 1626 BC cycles 8 years of 365 days back to Dec 2370 BC during the 40-day Flood, but the 243-year rotation (per point) of the Venus Pentacle positions causes 1625 BC to have the Dec position. (It should also be noted due to 600-year Venus being a half cycle of 1200, that 243 years before Amizaduga's death is the death of Shem Melchizedek in 1868 BC having the same December Venus as 1625 BC. Shem and Amizaduga have an exact same Julian date of Venus at their death, but this is shifted 16 years (4 leap days) from the Flood's Venus. Example, Jan 6 Venus of Flood occurs on Jan 1 or Jan 2 for Shem and Amizaduga. Another factor for the Jan 1 as five days before Jan 6 solstice is regarding the five epagum days as preceding a Thoth 1 of Jan 6 in 2001 BC when king Reu Aanipada died at age 239 having ruled 80 years (age 32-112) as 2207-2127 BC. (You may be king until your death, but you are not the ruling presiding king.) This confused the chronology due to simple minds thinking the 8 years will stay fixed to the same stars, assuming a 365-day date also stays fixed (by ignoring leap days).

This date in 1626 BC is 180 solar Gregorian leap days in 744 years instead of the 180 leap days  in 720 years. Thus the Maya assume that 2370 BC was half-way back to the Flood another 744 years earlier in 3114 BC. This convinces them that 3114 BC is correct because then 1770 BC is Noah's year 1344 after the Flood. Big mistake, born in 2970 BC and 600 years before the Flood 2370 BC, the 744 years after to 1626 BC is Noah's year 1344. The year 1770 BC is Noah's year 1200 (as 2970-1770 BC) which created the Venus cycle by noting swapped zodiac (180 days) in 600 years from the Flood. RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP: 1200 egyptian years of 365  days is 1199 Julian, note that five positions of Venus rotating in 243 years will total 1215 years, or 16 years more, twice 8 year Venus, confirming a full circle of the Pentacle.

The Maya thus swapped the purpose of the two Venus 1770 BC and 1626 BC. Venus 1770 BC is 1200 of Noah, and Venus 1626 BC is 2400 of Adam. But Maya reject 1770 BC as 2256 AM, claim it is year 3600 AM, claim it is Noah's 1344, and regard the Flood year 3114 BC as year 2256 AM. It all mathematically fits in a total different order than the reality. The year 2970 BC (Noah's birth) is then instead regarded as Ur being 144 years after the Flood. The double 72 years is a mistake for the fact that Ur's 137 Julian years is double (139x 360 days), plus 180 leap days to Exodus is the commonly known 857 years from Flood to Exodus. This 137 years or drift of 2 calendar years marks 2370-2233 BC but China (and Rome) see this 720 years 180 leap days to 1513 BC and they decide it marked half-way from a Flood of 2953 BC. These factors not only show the astral connection, they can be shown in the stars on an astronomy program, and in calendar changes made then to fit the new chronology. Such as Egyptian Thoth 1 of 2957 BC being called September 1 by the  Greeks. Thus then makes Toth 1 of 1514 BC during plagues a Sept 6 in the wrong belief it was preceded by five epagum days on Sep 1. In reality the 7th month Thoth was declared as new year on that 1514 BC Sep 6 date.

I admit my mistakes, I am like you, I make errors. As i said posted earlier this week, i thought that because  22/7 was an unending decimal that does not repeat itself, that it was the exact figure for pi until a man corrected me online 2 years ago by showing me a long decimal of pi not the same as a long decimal for 22/7. As scripture warns us, let us not return like a dog to anything we ever vomit out. But sadly they do... as in Wikipedia pushing a Sothic July 20 for 2000 BC when it was July 17  (at Memphis 30 degree latitude). NOt only is it not an exact 1460 years... calendar cycles are NOT star cycles, but it also differs a whole day for EACH and EVERY 69 mile degree of latitude north or south.